Monday, 11 April 2011

Napoleon and the Empire of Fashion

This time last year I was very busy working in preparation on the exhibition in Milan and the publication of the exhibition catalogue. As the English edition has been released recently I wanted to share a few backstage stories which occurred during this time.

After photographing 'Juliette' for the catalogue I was undressing the mannequin and Cristina and I were commenting that the gloves were too big. Cristina had chosen cut steel jewellery  and we discussed which pieces to use. As I was taking off the gloves I felt something in the fingers of the glove. Low and behold, two early cut steel buttons fell out which matched the jewellery. The gloves had never been used before and it was a very spooky moment. Cristina and I commented that we thought 'Juliette' had approved of the choice of cut steel jewellery!

From the beginning of the project in 2007 I really liked  the fact that Martin and Cristina had given each dress a name. Whilst the team were setting up on site for the exhibition, we referred to each dress mannequin by it's name as if they were characters in a production. This also helped greatly as the team was international and our common language were the names given to each mannequin.

In my experience, the reaction of visitors when they see clothes from the distant past is 'did people really wear that?' etc etc.  As the dresses in this collection are from a period where the body was not padded, panniered and stayed  you can see a real persons shape and you can relate to the shape too. Many of the dresses are a 'normal' size not a below zero! I began to gain a sense of the original wearer by seeing their natural form reflected in the cut of the clothes.  Martin pointed out one example with the men's breeches. You could see where the owner rode horseback from the cut of the leg and development of particular muscles.

Through studying the clothing over a long period of time I realised many dresses had a story to tell by the evidence left in the garment itself. You could see when a dress had been altered on the waistline as the 'Empire line' fluctuated at various stages but the excess fabric was left inside. 'Louise' one of the trained dresses had a tear on the edge of the train where someone had obviously stood on the back or it had got caught. This dress in particular was a rare survivor as despite the damage to the train, it was not cut off and shortened when they went out of fashion around 1806.

Many of the clothes in the exhibition had a family provenance. One memorable story was of 'Blanche' which is the wedding dress in the collection. It was worn in 1805 for the marriage and then after in 1811. During those six years the wearer had a few children but still kept her very slim shape as there was no sign of any alteration in the dress!

 Historic clothes can not only tell the story of the history and development of fashion but on many levels they reveal information about the original wearer and create a bridge to the past unlike other pieces of historical art or museum objects.


Maggie May's Historic Clothing said...

Very much looking forward to the release of the collection's catalog tomorrow. Thank you for sharing your curatorial experiences with us!

Kleidung um 1800 said...

Thank you for affording us an insight, it was a very interesting read!
Can't wait for the catalogue, too!

Fiorina said...

The exhibition was just marvellous. And I too love the fact that the dresses have names (Though I must admit, I am biased, as I name everything, from my MacBook, my projects down to Madame DuBarry, my dressform)

Kleidung um 1800 said...

Apologies for a second post...but: I just received my copy of the catalogue! (Happydance!) Having read only the introduction and admired the first few picture pages, yet, the house is already filled with "Looklooklook" and "Ohhhh" and "Awwww"! It's magnificient! And I so hope the exhibition will come to Cologne.

ZipZip said...

Dear Natalie, Can't wait to order it! Am vastly enjoying the behind- -the-scenes stories: they give us a rare perspective into the life of a professional.

Along those lines,: on the 1790s chemise dresses, did you mount them with underdresses? Were the chemises with sleeves? What were your options and how did you make your decisons? On later dresses I see underdresses, naturally, but wonder how you handled the transition era. Any chance you could blog about that?

Very best,

Natalie (Ferguson)

Fichu1800 said...

Thank you for your kind comments. I'm really you are enjoying the book.

For ZipZip (Natalie)yes certainly I'll prepare a blog post about the mounting.



ZipZip said...

Dear Natalie,

Thank you so much for being willing to blog about your experiences with deciding how to mount transparent dresses, especially 1790s ones. It cannot have been easy.

Very best,

Natalie Ferguson

Barbee said...

The book is lovely, Natalie! I've only had a chance to drool over the pictures, but those are worth the book. So much inspiration!
Hope you 1790s are going well.

Grace Elliot said...

Fascinating post. It's wonderful to think of each of those garmets having its own story. It must be amazing to work with them.
Grace x

Fichu1800 said...

@ Natalie I'm preparing clothes for an event next week so I'll prepare a dress mounting post for the beginning of May.

@ Grace thank you. Yes, I feel very priviledged to have worked with these dresses. I think also clothes can evoke so many emotions especially when you know it was worn for a special occasion.

Time Traveling in Costume said...

I thought I had posted here about the book but I guess not. Maybe on Facebook?
I received my book about a week ago, and the first thing that struck me was the models looked so "complete". They had accessories and wonderful colors added to the model so that they looked like real women dressed to go into the world. So refreshing after just seeing dress after dress hung but not really being "worn". You all did a great job.

Anonymous said...

bridal dresses
bridal gowns